The nameplate vs actual capacity question gets messy fast because there are at least four different numbers on the data plate and people use them interchangeably.
The number on the front of the press is the *rated tonnage at rated stroke position*. For a typical mechanical that's at 6mm above BDC. For a servo it's whatever the OEM tested at, often BDC or 1mm above. These are not equivalent ??comparing a servo's BDC rating to a mechanical's 6mm rating overstates the servo by 10-20%.
The second number is *continuous tonnage* vs *peak/intermittent tonnage*. Servo presses especially have a meaningful gap here. A 200-ton servo might have 200 ton continuous and 240 ton peak for short-duration draws. Run blanking at peak continuously and you cook the drive. The drive thermal model is what you're really pushing against, not the frame.
Third is *eccentric load capacity*. Most data plates list the centered tonnage and bury the eccentric derate in the spec sheet. For typical C-frames, an off-center die can derate the working tonnage by 30-50%. We've seen people specify a press for a die that lives in the eccentric-load derated region without realizing it.
Fourth is *stroke-position curve* (the cam curve on mechanicals, the velocity-torque envelope on servos). Tonnage available 25mm above BDC on a mechanical is a fraction of the rated number. On servo you can hold rated tonnage further up the stroke, which is one of the genuine technical advantages, but only if the drive is sized for it.
Practical advice: when sizing a press, work backward from the highest-tonnage operation in the deepest eccentric position you'll ever run, derate by 20% for safety, then check that against the *continuous* rating, not peak. If that math doesn't work, you're buying the wrong size press.