Adding to the OSHA gray area — if you're retrofitting an older mechanical press with a servo drive, you absolutely still fall under 1910.217 because the frame and clutch/brake mechanism are mechanical. The servo motor doesn't change the press classification in OSHA's eyes. We went through this with our 400T retrofit and the compliance officer was very clear about it.
Practical tip on the safety PLC side: don't cheap out on the safety controller. We tried using safety relays instead of a proper safety PLC on our first installation to save $4K. Ended up spending $12K six months later ripping it out and installing a Pilz PNOZmulti because the relay logic couldn't handle the muting sequences for our automated loading system. A safety PLC gives you the flexibility to modify muting zones, add light curtains, or change guard configurations without rewiring.
Also — annual validation of safety functions is not optional, even if your local AHJ doesn't explicitly require it. Document everything: SS1 stop times, STO response, light curtain reaction distance calculations. We keep a binder for each press. When the insurance auditor shows up (and they will), having that binder ready saves weeks of back-and-forth.