Tight windows are the right call, but there's a nuance people miss — you need separate windows for the approach phase vs the working phase. We run a 300T doing progressive die work and our die protection has 3 zones:
Zone 1 (approach, 0-5mm before contact): force must stay below 2% of capacity. Anything above that means a slug or misfeed. This is your early warning and it catches 80% of problems before they become expensive.
Zone 2 (working stroke): force window ±12% of the learned curve. We teach the curve over 50 good parts, not 5. Bigger sample smooths out the normal variation from material thickness tolerance and lube distribution.
Zone 3 (strip through): force must drop back below 8% within 3mm after breakthrough. If it doesn't, something is hanging up — slug on the punch face, strip not feeding, pilot pin dragging.
The other thing — if your press supports it, monitor the force curve SHAPE, not just peak force. We had a die wearing unevenly that kept the peak force within window but the curve shape was drifting. The area-under-curve check caught it about 2000 parts before it would have become a quality escape. Saved us a customer complaint on a medical connector job.
One practical tip: label your die protection setups with the die number and date. We store ours as recipes in the press controller. Nothing worse than loading the wrong protection profile after a die change and getting 50 false stops because the windows don't match.